I mentioned this in another post, but I wrote this post rather quickly and threw my thesis in as an afterthought, and ooops, it's the old one. I have changed it...my focus is more on why the scholars care. Why they deem it worthy to study or write about or think about, and why you can find literally hundreds of defenses and justification on the web and LJ. My assertion is because it is initally viewed as abnormal, not so much because it is found to be abnormal.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-11-24 09:52 pm (UTC)Does that make more sense?